Facing Sanctions: A Judge’s Perspective on Justice and Integrity
In a world where justice systems are continuously tested, the story of Judge Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza sheds light on the challenges faced by those who uphold international law. As a judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC), she recently came under U.S. sanctions, raising questions about the independence of international judicial authority. This article explores her experiences and thoughts on justice, integrity, and the implications of political influence on the judiciary.
Background of the International Criminal Court
The ICC, established under the Rome Statute in 1998, aims to prosecute the most serious offenses: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. Judge Ibáñez Carranza has served on this tribunal for nearly eight years, holding a permanent position in its Appeals Chamber.
U.S. Sanctions and Their Implications
This year, the U.S. government imposed sanctions on Ibáñez Carranza and several other judges and prosecutors of the ICC, including Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan. These actions were reportedly in response to arrest warrants issued against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant.
The U.S. justified its sanctions by asserting they oppose the politicization of justice and any judicial overreach by the ICC. It labeled the court as a threat to national security and an instrument for legal warfare against America and its allies.
A Judge’s Perspective on Sanctions
In her conversation with BBC Mundo, Judge Ibáñez Carranza shared the profound impact that these sanctions have had on her daily life. As a seasoned lawyer with over three decades of experience in Peru, she was accustomed to political pressures but never expected such actions to come from higher political powers after joining the ICC.
Understanding the Reasons Behind Sanctions
Addressing the specific reasons for her designation, she explained that it relates to a decision made six years ago regarding investigations into crimes in Afghanistan. This authorization was intended to give judicial oversight to atrocities committed by various parties in the conflict, which inadvertently angered the U.S.
The Daily Effects of Being Sanctioned
The sanctions have removed her ability to travel to the U.S. and severely restricted her financial activities, making it nearly impossible to conduct personal transactions. Judge Ibáñez revealed that she can no longer transfer money through services like Western Union or even order food, as these services often require credit cards linked to U.S. financial institutions.
Impact on Family and Colleagues
Judge Ibáñez noted that these sanctions extend to her family, affecting her daughter’s visa status due to her mother’s role. Others within the ICC who have been sanctioned have found themselves similarly limited in supporting their families financially.
The Role of Europe and International Support
She expressed discontent over how European banks have aligned with U.S. policies, leaving judges like her without resources and questioning the independence of European institutions.
Justice Beyond Borders
Reflecting on her commitment to justice, Ibáñez Carranza emphasized that these sanctions will not deter her from carrying out her duties. She reiterated her dedication to serving humanity through the law, declaring, “I am here because I feel it is a mission; my work serves humanity.” She believes that despite political interference, the ICC’s purpose remains vital for global justice.
Conclusion: The Fight for Justice Continues
Judge Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza’s experiences illustrate the stark realities many international judges face amid political strife. While sanctions pose significant challenges, her unwavering commitment to justice highlights the enduring necessity of independent judicial systems in maintaining global peace and order.
Key Takeaways
- The ICC was established to prosecute serious crimes against humanity and uphold international law.
- U.S. sanctions against ICC officials raise concerns about the political influence over the judiciary.
- Such sanctions have profound personal and familial effects on those sanctioned, limiting daily life and financial independence.
- Despite challenges, judges like Ibáñez Carranza remain committed to their mission of justice for humanity.